Mutton, Meters. E., & Gilbride, K. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict relationships (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, Tempe, AZ wife J. (2008). If I’m not hot, will you be sensuous or perhaps not?: Physical-elegance feedback and you can relationship needs while the a function of a person’s own appeal. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Website links ]
Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other intimate dating. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible matchmaking (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of ambition. When you look at the J. McV. Look (Ed.), Character and also the behavior disorders (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Press. [ Links ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting dating relationship fate with insiders’ and outsiders’ direction: Whom and you can what is actually expected issues. Personal Matchmaking, 13, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you can marital top quality in the newly wedded couples: Several mainly based method. Log of Personality and you may Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A great. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, E. R. (2006). Imagined resemblance and you can matchmaking profits among relationships partners: An enthusiastic idiographic approach. [ Backlinks ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A great. (2006). Online dating. Arizona, DC: Declaration on the Pew Websites & Western Life Investment. Retrieved , off [ Links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Evaluating the accuracy of forecasts on relationships relationship: How and exactly why carry out lovers’ predictions differ from those produced by observers? Personality and you may Public Therapy Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Links ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing items from the initiation regarding heterosexual relationships. Paper presented at the Basic Around the globe Appointment into Private Matchmaking, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]
Log out of Social and private Relationship, 23, 865-880
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Are genuine similarity essential destination? A beneficial meta-analysis off genuine and identified similarity. Journal regarding Public and personal Relationships, twenty-five, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]
Digital matchmaking and you can virtual appropriate: Conceptualizing pc mediated romantic relationships
Morry, M. Meters. (2005). Matchmaking fulfillment since an excellent predictor out-of similarity product reviews; A test of your destination-resemblance hypothesis. Diary regarding Personal and private Dating, twenty two, 561-584. [ Website links ]
Morry, Meters. Yards. (2007). The newest interest-similarity hypothesis among get across-gender nearest and dearest: Relationships pleasure, thought of similarities, and you will worry about-offering thinking. Log away from Social and private Dating, twenty four, 117-138. [ Links ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). An explanation and you will extension of the SVR concept from dyadic combining. Record from ily, 49, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). That will divorce proceedings: A beneficial 14-year longitudinal examination of black lovers and light partners. Record out-of Social and private Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Website links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The love formula Meets believes this has discovered an algorithm for ruling the web relationship company: A scientific strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Right. Providers dos.0 Mag. Retrieved on off [ Website links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent survive – Identification parallels during the partners. Identification and Private Distinctions, 45, 533-535. [ Website links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Mate preferences: Just what services do people attention within short-identity sexual and you will much time-identity close couples? Record off Therapy and Peoples Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The new character of your own care about throughout the initiation and you may span of public communication. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]