Adult sharksucker remora (Elizabeth. naucrates).
The best ranking GLMM having E. naucrates contains all predictors (site form, intercourse, readiness, and you can year) (S1 Desk). The brand new design (Fig 8) suggests that E. naucrates was in fact probably are introduce that have M. alfredi on cleanup programs, that have been 49% more likely than simply from the eating section (Otherwise = 0.51). This hitchhiker species has also been probably to get expose towards women within their cuatro th trimester of being pregnant (Otherwise = 2.6), which was 160% greater than low-pregnant female (site group), when you’re people (Otherwise = 0.59) was in fact 41% less likely to want to enjoys Elizabeth. naucrates hitchhikers than simply low-pregnant females. Echeneis naucrates was in fact the very least probably be present towards the juvenile Yards. alfredi (Otherwise = 0.67), which were 30% less inclined to have this hitchhiker varieties than just grownups (resource class). The newest GLMM as well as demonstrates that the possibilities of Age. naucrates exposure with Meters. alfredi is large inside NE Monsoon (reference class), which had been 25% apt to be than from inside the SW Monsoon (Otherwise = 0.75).
Indicates the likelihood of presence in comparison with the reference category shown in the legend. OR values are plotted with 95% confidence intervals (CI; solid horizontal lines). Where the CI does not span 1, the explanatory variable is significantly https://datingranking.net/local-singles/ more likely when OR > 1, and significantly less likely when OR < 1. (A) Mobula alfredi and Echeneis naucrates, (B) M. alfredi and juvenile E. naucrates, (C) M. alfredi and Lutjanus bohar, (D) M. alfredi and Gnathanodon speciosus presence, and (E) M. birostris and Remora remora.
Teenager sharksucker remora (Age. naucrates).
The highest ranking GLMM for teenager Age. naucrates contains all four predictors (webpages form, gender, maturity, and you will year). The fresh design (Fig 8) signifies that teenager Age. naucrates was indeed most likely as expose with M. alfredi at eating section (Otherwise = dos.08), that was 108% apt to be than in the tidy up stations (reference class). Teenager E. naucrates were together with prone to show up for the juvenile Yards. alfredi (Or = 2.37), which were 137% very likely to get this hitchhiker group than people (site class). Men Yards. alfredi (Or = step one.59) had been 59% apt to be than ladies for juvenile E. naucrates establish, and you can juvenile Elizabeth. naucrates was indeed the very least more likely present having M. alfredi during the SW Monsoon (Or = 0.63); 37% unlikely than just when you look at the NE Monsoon (resource classification).
Reddish snapper (L. bohar).
The highest ranking GLMM for L. bohar (Fig 8) contained one significant predictor (site function) and suggests that the species were most likely to be present with M. alfredi at cleaning stations (reference category), which was 100% more likely than at feeding areas (OR = 0). There was one model with ?AICc <2 (S1 Table), which was the same as the highest-ranking model with the addition of season, but this predictor was non-significant (p>0.05).
Fantastic trevally (Grams. speciosus).
The highest ranking GLMM for G. speciosus contained two significant predictors (site function and maturity status). Gnathanodon speciosus were most likely to be present with M. alfredi at cleaning stations (reference category), which was 22% more likely than at feeding areas (OR = 0.78) (Fig 8). There were two models with ?AICc <2 (S1 Table). One of these models contained the same predictors as the highest-ranking model with the addition of season, but this predictor was non-significant (p>0.05). The other model contained only the predictor maturity status, which suggested G. speciosus were more likely to be present on juvenile M. alfredi (OR = 1.5), which were 55% more likely to have this hitchhiker species than adults (reference category).